<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Brothers Kept Apart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brotherskeptapart.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com</link>
	<description>Examining the Christian and Muslim religious traditions that have kept Christians and Muslims apart for over 1,300 years.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 03:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who is Jesus according to the Bible? by brotherska</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/2010/09/27/who-is-jesus-according-to-the-bible/#comment-11756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brotherska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 03:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherskeptapart.com/?p=84#comment-11756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear John:

You have simply provided components of your religious tradition rather Biblical evidence.  Let us consider the Biblical evidence.

The verse that you referred to John 1:1, dt does not say that Jesus was God or that the Word is God, but that the Word was with God, and was God in the beginning. Let us try to discuss this issue without damaging the integrity of the evidence.

It is possible that a person’s words, before they are spoken, can be considered to be part of the person. My words not yet spoken are with me, and can be said to be me. However, once spoken, they represent me, but are separate from me. Let us see whether this explanation maintains the integrity of the evidence.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. (John 1:1–2)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

The unspoken Word was with God in the beginning. This unspoken Word was God.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. (John 1:3)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
The unspoken Word was spoken and creation was the result. The “Word of God” is the Word that belongs to God and came from God.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. (John 1:4–5)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

Once spoken, the Word became a separate entity with a life of His own.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

The Word, separated from God, eventually became flesh. The idea of the Word having life in Himself, and the Word becoming flesh, is consistent with Jesus’ description of Himself.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have life in Himself, and has given Him authority to execute judgment also, because He is the Son of Man. (John 5:26–27)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John:</p>
<p>You have simply provided components of your religious tradition rather Biblical evidence.  Let us consider the Biblical evidence.</p>
<p>The verse that you referred to John 1:1, dt does not say that Jesus was God or that the Word is God, but that the Word was with God, and was God in the beginning. Let us try to discuss this issue without damaging the integrity of the evidence.</p>
<p>It is possible that a person’s words, before they are spoken, can be considered to be part of the person. My words not yet spoken are with me, and can be said to be me. However, once spoken, they represent me, but are separate from me. Let us see whether this explanation maintains the integrity of the evidence.</p>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. (John 1:1–2)</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>The unspoken Word was with God in the beginning. This unspoken Word was God.</p>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. (John 1:3)</p></blockquote>
<p></em><br />
The unspoken Word was spoken and creation was the result. The “Word of God” is the Word that belongs to God and came from God.</p>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. (John 1:4–5)</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>Once spoken, the Word became a separate entity with a life of His own.</p>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14)</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>The Word, separated from God, eventually became flesh. The idea of the Word having life in Himself, and the Word becoming flesh, is consistent with Jesus’ description of Himself.</p>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>
<blockquote>For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have life in Himself, and has given Him authority to execute judgment also, because He is the Son of Man. (John 5:26–27)</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who is Jesus according to the Bible? by john</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/2010/09/27/who-is-jesus-according-to-the-bible/#comment-11752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherskeptapart.com/?p=84#comment-11752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the beginning was the Word (GOD the Father) and the Word was with GOD (GOD the Son) and the Word was GOD (Father and Jesus are GOD.)
One GOD Head with three separate beings.
The Father = GOD, The Son = GOD, The Holy Spirit = GOD. The Father is not the Son or the Holy Spirit..He is GOD the Father. The Son is not the
Father or the Holy Spirit... He is GOD the Son (Jesus.) The Holy Spirit is not
the Father or the Son...He is GOD the Holy Spirit.
GOD the Father / Perfect Spirit Being. GOD the Son / Perfect Flesh Being
GOD the Holy Spirit / Perfect Power that works wonderous miracles.
Three perfect divine beings united in One GOD Head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the beginning was the Word (GOD the Father) and the Word was with GOD (GOD the Son) and the Word was GOD (Father and Jesus are GOD.)<br />
One GOD Head with three separate beings.<br />
The Father = GOD, The Son = GOD, The Holy Spirit = GOD. The Father is not the Son or the Holy Spirit..He is GOD the Father. The Son is not the<br />
Father or the Holy Spirit&#8230; He is GOD the Son (Jesus.) The Holy Spirit is not<br />
the Father or the Son&#8230;He is GOD the Holy Spirit.<br />
GOD the Father / Perfect Spirit Being. GOD the Son / Perfect Flesh Being<br />
GOD the Holy Spirit / Perfect Power that works wonderous miracles.<br />
Three perfect divine beings united in One GOD Head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this Site by brotherska</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/#comment-10808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brotherska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Joshua:

1.  Qur&#039;an 19:31-34 appears to be consistent with Jesus&#039; death and ressurection.

2.  Qur&#039;an 4:157-158 does not say that Jesus did not die on the cross, but that he was not killed by the Jews.  Further, the idea that someone like Jesus was crucified is not found in the Qur&#039;an - that is an Islamic religious tradition.

3.  Qur&#039;an 9:30 does not describe the concept of Son of God as described in the Bible.  The Qur&#039;an was opposed to the idea of God having sexual intercourse with Mary to produce a Son.

Therefore, no contradictions in the Qur&#039;an or with the Bible.  Have you read the detailed evidence in the book?

Regards,
Walter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joshua:</p>
<p>1.  Qur&#8217;an 19:31-34 appears to be consistent with Jesus&#8217; death and ressurection.</p>
<p>2.  Qur&#8217;an 4:157-158 does not say that Jesus did not die on the cross, but that he was not killed by the Jews.  Further, the idea that someone like Jesus was crucified is not found in the Qur&#8217;an &#8211; that is an Islamic religious tradition.</p>
<p>3.  Qur&#8217;an 9:30 does not describe the concept of Son of God as described in the Bible.  The Qur&#8217;an was opposed to the idea of God having sexual intercourse with Mary to produce a Son.</p>
<p>Therefore, no contradictions in the Qur&#8217;an or with the Bible.  Have you read the detailed evidence in the book?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Walter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this Site by J.</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/#comment-10806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you explain that in the Qu&#039;ran (19:31-34) it says that Jesus did die on the cross, but in another passage (4:157-158) it says he didn&#039;t die on the cross, that it was just someone that looked like Jesus? And in 9:30 it says that it is utter blasphemy that Jesus was the son of God. How can you explain these passages and how they contradict themselves, let alone contradicting the Bible?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you explain that in the Qu&#8217;ran (19:31-34) it says that Jesus did die on the cross, but in another passage (4:157-158) it says he didn&#8217;t die on the cross, that it was just someone that looked like Jesus? And in 9:30 it says that it is utter blasphemy that Jesus was the son of God. How can you explain these passages and how they contradict themselves, let alone contradicting the Bible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this Site by Brotherska</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/#comment-9198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brotherska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ben:

Muslims are taught a range of behaviours by their religious leaders.  Many of these leaders teach Muslims to distrust Christians.  They generally view Christians as how Christians generally view Jews.  Let me explain.

Christians are taught (and the Bible supports this teaching) that God&#039;s words were given to the Israelites by prophet Moses. However, after centuries of disobedience by the Israelites, God&#039;s words were taught by the Messiah, Jesus, to the Jews.  Jesus&#039; Jewish followers then taught them to many different nations, and soon, the number of Jewish belieers were a minority.

Christians generally view Jews who do not accept Jesus as the Messiah as misguided, and Jews generally view those who accept Jesus as the Messiah as similarly misguided.

Muslims generally view anyone who does not accept their prophet Mohammed as misguided.  However, when this belief is coupled with the idea that they are currently engaged in a holy war, or jihad, then the misguided can be viewed as the enemy of Islam and a legitimate target of persecution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben:</p>
<p>Muslims are taught a range of behaviours by their religious leaders.  Many of these leaders teach Muslims to distrust Christians.  They generally view Christians as how Christians generally view Jews.  Let me explain.</p>
<p>Christians are taught (and the Bible supports this teaching) that God&#8217;s words were given to the Israelites by prophet Moses. However, after centuries of disobedience by the Israelites, God&#8217;s words were taught by the Messiah, Jesus, to the Jews.  Jesus&#8217; Jewish followers then taught them to many different nations, and soon, the number of Jewish belieers were a minority.</p>
<p>Christians generally view Jews who do not accept Jesus as the Messiah as misguided, and Jews generally view those who accept Jesus as the Messiah as similarly misguided.</p>
<p>Muslims generally view anyone who does not accept their prophet Mohammed as misguided.  However, when this belief is coupled with the idea that they are currently engaged in a holy war, or jihad, then the misguided can be viewed as the enemy of Islam and a legitimate target of persecution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this Site by Ben O</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/#comment-9196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do Muslims hate Christians so much?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do Muslims hate Christians so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Hope by Lodewijk Langeweg</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/2009/04/22/the-audacity-of-hope/#comment-6306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lodewijk Langeweg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherskeptapart.com/?p=48#comment-6306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS:
Walter,
I know you know this, but it might be interesting for Muslims to read the quotes from the Bible I gave a link to. 

The suras in the Qur&#039;an referring to the Bible are generally understood as meaning that the Bible texts -and especially in the NT- were altered.
But it is my understanding that what is really meant is that the interpretations were distorted, not the actual text.

This must be the case, because there are many very old Biblical manuscripts on display in museums, written in the time the described events took place, or only a few decades later. And those ancient text are not different from the currently printed ones, although some versions vary slightly in their translations to other languages. But same is the case with the translations of Qur&#039;an. And the texts of the latter book were written down considerable time after the events they describe, as is also the case with the Hadith.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS:<br />
Walter,<br />
I know you know this, but it might be interesting for Muslims to read the quotes from the Bible I gave a link to. </p>
<p>The suras in the Qur&#8217;an referring to the Bible are generally understood as meaning that the Bible texts -and especially in the NT- were altered.<br />
But it is my understanding that what is really meant is that the interpretations were distorted, not the actual text.</p>
<p>This must be the case, because there are many very old Biblical manuscripts on display in museums, written in the time the described events took place, or only a few decades later. And those ancient text are not different from the currently printed ones, although some versions vary slightly in their translations to other languages. But same is the case with the translations of Qur&#8217;an. And the texts of the latter book were written down considerable time after the events they describe, as is also the case with the Hadith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Hope by Lodewijk Langeweg</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/2009/04/22/the-audacity-of-hope/#comment-6300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lodewijk Langeweg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherskeptapart.com/?p=48#comment-6300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter: &quot;Is He more than a prophet as the Bible and Qur’an claim?&quot;

I thought the Qur&#039;an claims that Jesus is but a prophet, not the Son of God, while in the Bible there are examples that can be easily interpreted as meaning that He is indeed God in human appearance.

&quot;Bible verses that show Jesus is Divine&quot;:
http://carm.org/bible-verses-show-jesus-divine]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter: &#8220;Is He more than a prophet as the Bible and Qur’an claim?&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought the Qur&#8217;an claims that Jesus is but a prophet, not the Son of God, while in the Bible there are examples that can be easily interpreted as meaning that He is indeed God in human appearance.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bible verses that show Jesus is Divine&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://carm.org/bible-verses-show-jesus-divine" rel="nofollow">http://carm.org/bible-verses-show-jesus-divine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Hope by mikeherbalifew45</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/2009/04/22/the-audacity-of-hope/#comment-6274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeherbalifew45]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brotherskeptapart.com/?p=48#comment-6274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved as much as you&#039;ll obtain carried out right here. The comic strip is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. however, you command get bought an nervousness over that you want be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further earlier again since precisely the same just about a lot ceaselessly inside of case you protect this increase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved as much as you&#8217;ll obtain carried out right here. The comic strip is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. however, you command get bought an nervousness over that you want be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further earlier again since precisely the same just about a lot ceaselessly inside of case you protect this increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this Site by brotherska</title>
		<link>http://brotherskeptapart.com/#comment-5366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brotherska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 04:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Martin:

If you are unable to purchase the book on Amazon.com, then you can send a money order or check for the equivalent of US$30 and I can post you a copy. Please send the postal address to BrothersKeptApart@gmail.com.  You can also send me the address of the nearest library and I can send them a copy.

Regards,
Walter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin:</p>
<p>If you are unable to purchase the book on Amazon.com, then you can send a money order or check for the equivalent of US$30 and I can post you a copy. Please send the postal address to <a href="mailto:BrothersKeptApart@gmail.com">BrothersKeptApart@gmail.com</a>.  You can also send me the address of the nearest library and I can send them a copy.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Walter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

